Skip to main content

Security Incident Response

Definition: Architecture Decision Record from where you should specialise the ADR SBBs regarding the Security Incident Response

Source: ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010:2022

Source reference: https://www.iso.org/standard/74393.html

Additional information: The Security Incident Response concept involves the development of a comprehensive plan to detect, respond to, and recover from security incidents that may occur within an organization's information systems. The plan should include procedures for identifying and assessing potential threats, as well as protocols for containing and mitigating the impact of any incidents that do occur. The goal of the Security Incident Response concept is to minimize the risk of data loss, system downtime, and other negative consequences that can result from security breaches. Effective implementation of this concept requires ongoing monitoring and testing of security measures, as well as regular training and awareness programs for employees.

Example: Security Incident Response:
Decision: Establishing an incident response plan to handle security breaches and incidents.
Rationale: Having a well-defined incident response plan enables a quick and coordinated response to security incidents, minimizing potential damage, and facilitating the recovery and restoration of normal operations.

LOST view: Digital Solution Architecture Decisions Catalogue view

Identifier: http://data.europa.eu/dr8/egovera/SecurityIncidentResponseGoal

EIRA traceability: eira:DigitalSolutionArchitectureDecisionGoal

ABB name: egovera:SecurityIncidentResponseGoal

EIRA concept: eira:ArchitectureBuildingBlock

Last modification: 2023-06-15

dct:identifier: ADR-20230515180947632

dct:title: Architecture Decision Record about Security Incident Response

eira:adr_context: The context explains why we need to make a decision. It also describes the alternatives along with the pros and cons.

eira:adr_decision: The decision describes the justification for why the particular solution was accepted. It has more emphasis on the why rather than the how.

eira:adr_status: [Proposed (under review)|Accepted (approved and ready for implementation)|Superseded (superseded by another decision)]

eira:adr_consecuences: The consequences section contains information about the overall impact of an architectural decision. Every decision has trade-offs. That’s why it’s crucial to include the analysis to provide a clear picture.