Adequacy Recognition

Definition: Architecture Decision Record from where you should specialise the ADR SBBs regarding the Adequacy Recognition

Source: ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010:2022

Source reference: https://www.iso.org/standard/74393.html

Additional information: Adequacy recognition refers to the degree to which the process of evaluating the suitability, completeness, and reliability of data or information within a software system is user-friendly, intuitive, and efficient. It encompasses the design and implementation of interfaces, workflows, and feedback mechanisms that enable users to easily and effectively perform adequacy recognition tasks.

Example: Title: Adequacy Recognition Architecture Decision Record (ADR)

LOST view: Digital Solution Architecture Decisions Catalogue view

Identifier: http://data.europa.eu/dr8/egovera/AdequacyRecognitionGoal

EIRA traceability: eira:DigitalSolutionArchitectureDecisionGoal

ABB name: egovera:AdequacyRecognitionGoal

EIRA concept: eira:ArchitectureBuildingBlock

Last modification: 2023-07-06

dct:identifier: ADR-20230606091024719

dct:title: Architecture Decision Record about Adequacy Recognition

eira:adr_context: The context explains why we need to make a decision. It also describes the alternatives along with the pros and cons.

eira:adr_decision: The decision describes the justification for why the particular solution was accepted. It has more emphasis on the why rather than the how.

eira:adr_status: [Proposed (under review)|Accepted (approved and ready for implementation)|Superseded (superseded by another decision)]

eira:adr_consecuences: The consequences section contains information about the overall impact of an architectural decision. Every decision has trade-offs. That’s why it’s crucial to include the analysis to provide a clear picture.