The following table shows the global data for the ongoing version of ELIS. As an EIF driver, the result reflected in this dashboard builds on EIRA 5.0.1. The analysis of the metrics can be found in the following tabs.
Metrics/ view |
Legal |
Organisational |
Semantic |
Technical |
Total |
|
Total number of ABBs |
14 | 39 | 30 | 175 | 258 |
|
#ABBs in scope |
13 | 24 | 30 | 174 | 241 |
|
%ABBs in scope |
93% | 62% | 100% | 99% | 94% |
|
#ABBs covered |
12 | 20 | 28 | 158 | 214*** |
|
%ABBs covered |
93% | 84% | 94% | 89% | 89% |
|
#Specs per View |
62 | 32 | 90 | 189 | 332* |
|
#Specs assessed (EIF scenario) |
5 | 8 | 31 | 43 | 68 |
|
#ABBs covered by an assessed spec |
10 | 8 | 22 | 78 | 118 |
|
%ABBs covered by an assessed spec |
84% | 40% | 79% | 51% | 56% |
|
Assessment Score Average in EIF scenario (v5.0.1) assessments** |
86% | ||||
|
Strength of assessment score average in EIF scenario (v5.0.1) assessments** |
86% | ||||
|
Assessment Score Average in EIF scenario (Previous versions) assessments** |
85% | ||||
|
Strength of assessment score average in EIF scenario (Previous versions) assessments** |
83% |
* This total is referring to the number of specifications contained in the ELIS, therefore, the total is different from the sum for the different views since there are specifications that are in more than one view.
** The following table represents the score range of the assessment results (%) that ensures its fit for purpose in the ELIS:
- 0-64 Not acceptable fit for purpose
- 65-74 Minimal acceptable fit for purpose. Candidate to be deprecated by a better alternative
- 75-89 Strong fit for purpose
- 90-100 Full fit for purpose
*** The number of specs in scope will evolve throughout the ELIS population process.
Note: Only specifications with a strength score equal to or higher than 75% are considered in the ELIS.