Not properly an issue...
As noted, the Vocabulary should be simpler and flexible enough to be used outside the e-Procurement domain.
The Criteria - Evidence matching is part of Decision Making processes
Apart form the common Criteria framework, I have found the following example of a Decision Ontology
It is inthe proposal form and there may be some issues there, but IMHO it is worth a look and the inclusion among the examples:
The Decision ontology proposal
https://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/decision/XGR-decision-20120417/Sample…
and the Ontology pattern for the "Criterion" concept
The "Evidences" are resources that support the assessment of the effective fulfillment of a criterion by some Entity.
We can describe Evidences (resources) with Dublin core metadata and with the Resource Description Framework (RDF) and based on a Criterion ontology it is not difficult to produce a simple model where evidences cover some Criterion fulfillment principle (completely or partially).
Component
DocumentationCategory
improvement
Login or create an account to comment.
Comments
We will provide a RDF model.
The issue was solved - you included this part in the specification:
The "Evidences" are resources that support the assessment of the effective fulfillment of a criterion by some Entity. We can describe Evidences (resources) with Dublin core metadata and with the Resource Description Framework (RDF) and based on a Criterion ontology it is not difficult to produce a simple model where evidences cover some Criterion fulfillment principle (completely or partially). That suffices in my opinion.