In the spec, nothing is said about how temporal coverage should be actually represented - i.e., which properties will have dct:PeriodOfTime as domain.
Are we waiting for any resolution from the W3C GLD WG? Or the idea is to use the approach adopted in ADMS [1]?
Component
DocumentationCategory
improvement
Login or create an account to comment.
Comments
Consideration
A description of the properties for dct:PeriodOfTime is indeed absent.
Proposed resolution
Add a description of Period Of Time
Proposed action
Update specification, adding an optional class Period of time (dct:PeriodOfTime) to the table in section 6.2, and a section to describe it in section 7, with two optional properties schema:startDate and schema:endDate of which at least one must occur.
Resolved at meeting 18 July 2013, see report at https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/document/dcat-application-profile-wg-virtual-meeting-2013-07-18.
Resolution implemented in draft 0.04 at https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/document/dcat-application-profile-data-portals-europe-draft-final-text