The Open Data Institute (ODI) is carrying out work on an Open Data Rights Statement vocabulary (ODRS) that may be relevant to DCAT-AP as far as licensing is concerned [1,2].
In this thread [3], more details are provided about the scope of ODRS and the difference with similar initiatives - as the ccRel voc [4,5], ODRL [6], and even the DCAT-AP approach based on the notion of licence type (for this, see in particular [7]).
It may be worth including a reference to ODRS in the DCAT-AP spec.
- http://theodi.org/blog/machine-readable-rights-statements
- http://schema.theodi.org/odrs/
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2013Jul/0007.html
- http://wiki.creativecommons.org/CC_REL
- http://www.w3.org/Submission/ccREL/
- http://www.w3.org/community/odrl/
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2013Jul/0010.html
Component
DocumentationCategory
improvement
Login or
create an account to comment.
Comments
Andrfea,
I see no problem including a reference to ODRS. Can you suggest wording and where to include it?
With pleasure. But I would suggest including in the spec a section on licensing where we can mention relevant work in the area.
I am now including the following:
Resolved at meeting 18 July 2013, see report at https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/document/dcat-application-profile-wg-virtual-meeting-2013-07-18.
Resolution implemented in draft 0.04 at https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/document/dcat-application-profile-data-portals-europe-draft-final-text
Resolved at meeting 18 July 2013, see report at https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/document/dcat-application-profile-wg-virtual-meeting-2013-07-18.
Resolution implemented in draft 0.04 at https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/document/dcat-application-profile-data-portals-europe-draft-final-text