{"text_format":"1","workbook":"xlsx","n_sheets":15,"sheets":["Cover","Setup_MSP","Setup_TS","Sheet1","Assessment_MSP","Setup_EIF","Setup_ODSAT","Assessment_ODSAT","Assessment_EIF","Assessment_TS","Results","ResultsTS","ResultsMSP","Results ","ResultsODSAT"],"not_rendered":{"charts":3,"images":3,"macros":1,"external_links":1,"defined_names":2,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900"}

{"sheet":"Cover","index":0,"n_rows":47,"n_cols":12,"rows_kept":47,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[6,0,6,2],[41,1,41,8],[11,0,11,11],[12,0,12,11],[18,4,18,7],[19,4,19,7],[36,1,39,10],[25,1,27,10],[29,1,32,10],[14,4,14,8],[22,1,23,10],[15,4,15,7]]}
[null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"joinup"]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[" CAMSS Solution"]
["ASSESSMENT TOOLS"]
[]
[null,null,null,null,"        Tool version: 3.0.0"]
[null,null,null,null," Tool Release Date: 30/04/2019"]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,null,"Select the Assessment Scenario"]
[null,null,null,null,"EIF"]
[]
[]
[null,"This CAMSS scenario is dedicated to the assesment of formal technical specification, in general terms. \nAccording to the regulation on standardisation 1025/2022, a technical specification is a \"document that prescribes technical requirements to be fulfilled by a product, process, service or system\". "]
[]
[]
[null,"This CAMSS scenario is dedicated to the assessment of  formal specifications in the context of public procurement. The criteria used are laid out in the Annex II of the regulation on standardisation 1025_2012 as requirements for the identification of ICT technical specifications for their use in procurement"]
[]
[]
[]
[null,"The European Interoperability Framework(EIF) provides guidance to public administrations on how to improve governance of their interoperability activities, establish cross-organisational relationships, streamline processes supporting end-to-end digital services, and ensure that existing and new legislation do not compromise interoperability efforts.This CAMSS Scenario allows to assess the compliance of interoperability specifications with the EIF. The objective of the obtained assessment is to determine the suitability of the assessed interoperability specification for the delivery of interoperable European public services."]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,"PENDING SAT TO BE PRODUCED"]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,"For any request related to CAMSS, please send an email by clicking on this button:"]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,null,"Technical specification"]
[null,null,null,null,"MSP"]
[null,null,null,null,"EIF"]

{"sheet":"Setup_MSP","index":1,"n_rows":61,"n_cols":20,"rows_kept":61,"cut":false,"hidden":true,"merged":[[2,0,2,17],[6,3,6,5],[6,7,6,16],[8,3,8,5],[8,7,8,16],[10,3,10,5],[10,7,10,16],[12,3,12,5],[12,7,12,16],[14,3,14,5],[14,7,14,16],[16,3,16,5],[16,7,16,16],[18,3,18,5],[18,7,18,16],[22,3,22,5],[22,7,22,16],[24,3,24,5],[24,7,24,16],[26,3,26,5],[26,7,26,16],[28,3,28,5],[28,7,28,16],[52,3,52,9],[52,13,52,16],[30,3,30,5],[30,7,30,16],[32,3,32,5],[32,7,32,16],[34,3,34,5],[34,7,34,16],[54,3,54,9],[54,13,54,16],[60,0,60,16],[36,3,36,5],[36,7,36,16],[38,3,38,5],[38,7,38,16],[40,3,40,5],[40,7,40,16],[43,13,43,16],[46,3,46,9],[46,13,46,16],[58,3,58,9],[58,13,58,16],[48,3,48,9],[48,13,48,16]]}
[]
[]
["Please, fill in the mandatory* information to  start the assessment","Please, fill in the mandatory* information to  start the asseement","Please, fill in the mandatory* information to  start the asseement","Please, fill in the mandatory* information to  start the asseement","Please, fill in the mandatory* information to  start the asseement","Please, fill in the mandatory* information to  start the asseement","Please, fill in the mandatory* information to  start the asseement","Please, fill in the mandatory* information to  start the asseement","Please, fill in the mandatory* information to  start the asseement","Please, fill in the mandatory* information to  start the asseement","Please, fill in the mandatory* information to  start the asseement","Please, fill in the mandatory* information to  start the asseement","Please, fill in the mandatory* information to  start the asseement"]
[]
[null,null,null,"INFORMATION ON THE SUBMITTER"]
[]
[null,null,"L1","Last name, First name"]
[]
[null,null,"L2","Organisation"]
[]
[null,null,"L3","Position/ Role"]
[]
[null,null,"L4","Contact address"]
[]
[null,null,"L5","Contact phone number"]
[]
[null,null,"L6","Contact email"]
[]
[null,null,"L7","Date of submission",null,null,"*"]
[]
[null,null,null,"INFORMATION ON THE SUBMISSION"]
[]
[null,null,"P1","Title of specification",null,null,"*"]
[]
[null,null,"P2","Address where the version of the specification can be obtained",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"P3","Name, identifier and website of the standard developing/setting organisation (SDO/SSO) of the specification",null,null,"*",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"P4","Contact information/contact person \na) for the organisation\nb) for the specification submitted",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"P5","Reason for the submission, the need and intended use for the specification",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"P6","If any other evaluation of this specification is known, e.g. by member states or European Commission projects, provide a link to this evaluation.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"P7","State whether this submission concerns:\nA) Identification of a new specification\nB) a revision of an already identified specification \nC) a proposal to withdraw the identification of an already identified specification  ",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"P8","If P.7, Case B, applies:\nplease provide information on backward and forward compatibility with the version already approved. ",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"P9","If P.7, Case C applies:\nexplain why the ICT specification  no longer complies with the requirements for identification or the reasons for its withdrawal",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"P10","The submitted ICT specification is :\nA) the first ICT specification from this standards developing organisation\nB) an ICT specification coming from a SDO of which a specification has previously been identified and which has undergone the same development and approval processes in the organisation.\n",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,null,"CONSIDERATION"]
[]
[null,null,null,"          CORRECTNESS"]
[]
[null,null,"C1","The previous information in this page are correctly provided"]
[]
[null,null,"C2","The complete documentation to perform the assessement is provided"]
[]
[null,null,null,"            RELEVANCE"]
[]
[null,null,"C3","The functional area of application for the formal specification is addressing interoperabiity and eGovernment",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"C4","The formal specification meets business needs of public administrations"]
[]
[null,null,null,"            LEGISLATION AND REGULATION"]
[]
[null,null,"C5","The formal specification doesn’t hamper the regulatory requirements for its area of application",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
["Please, fill in the mandatory* information to  start the assessment"]

{"sheet":"Setup_TS","index":2,"n_rows":107,"n_cols":14,"rows_kept":107,"cut":false,"hidden":true,"merged":[[18,3,18,5],[18,7,18,16],[20,3,20,5],[20,7,20,16],[14,3,14,5],[14,7,14,16],[16,3,16,5],[16,7,16,16],[26,7,26,16],[28,3,28,5],[32,3,32,5],[32,7,32,16],[22,3,22,5],[22,7,22,16],[24,3,24,5],[24,7,24,16],[106,1,106,17],[26,3,26,5],[36,3,36,5],[36,7,36,16],[38,3,38,5],[38,7,38,16],[28,7,28,16],[30,3,30,5],[30,7,30,16],[40,3,40,5],[40,7,40,16],[42,3,42,5],[42,7,42,16],[44,3,44,5],[44,7,44,16],[46,3,46,5],[12,3,12,5],[12,7,12,16],[6,3,6,5],[6,7,6,16],[8,3,8,5],[8,7,8,16],[10,3,10,5],[10,7,10,16],[46,7,46,16],[48,3,48,5],[48,7,48,16],[50,3,50,5],[50,7,50,16],[52,3,52,5],[52,7,52,16],[54,3,54,5],[54,7,54,16],[56,3,56,5],[56,7,56,16],[58,3,58,5],[58,7,58,16],[60,3,60,5],[60,7,60,16],[62,3,62,5],[62,7,62,16],[64,3,64,5],[64,7,64,16],[66,3,66,5],[66,7,66,16],[68,3,68,5],[68,7,68,16],[78,3,78,5],[78,7,78,16],[80,3,80,5],[80,7,80,16],[70,3,70,5],[70,7,70,16],[72,3,72,5],[72,7,72,16],[74,3,74,5],[74,7,74,16],[0,3,2,16],[98,3,98,9],[102,3,102,9],[104,3,104,9],[82,3,82,5],[82,7,82,16],[84,3,84,5],[84,7,84,16],[96,3,96,9],[86,3,86,5],[86,7,86,16],[88,3,88,5],[88,7,88,16],[94,3,94,9],[76,3,76,5],[76,7,76,16]]}
[null,null,null,"Please, fill in the mandatory* information to  start the assessment"]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,"INFORMATION ON THE SUBMITTER"]
[]
[null,null,"L1","Name, First name"]
[]
[null,null,"L2","Organisation"]
[]
[null,null,"L3","Position / Role"]
[]
[null,null,"L4","Contact address"]
[]
[null,null,"L5","Contact phone number"]
[]
[null,null,"L6","Contact email"]
[]
[null,null,"L7","Date of submission",null,null,"*"]
[]
[null,null,"L8","Scenario for assessment",null,null,"*","Technical Specification"]
[]
[null,null,"L9","Public administration"]
[]
[null,null,"L10","Alternatives considered"]
[]
[null,null,"L11","Process approach"]
[]
[null,null,"L12","Members of Assessment panel "]
[]
[null,null,"L13","Consultation and validation roles"]
[]
[null,null,"L14","Members of decision making body"]
[]
[null,null,null,"INFORMATION ON THE SUBMISSION"]
[]
[null,null,"P1","Title of specification",null,null,"*"]
[]
[null,null,"P2","Address where the version of the specification can be obtained"]
[]
[null,null,"P3","Name and website of the standard developing/setting organisation (SDO/SSO) of the specification",null,null,"*"]
[]
[null,null,"P4","Contact information/contact person \na) for the organisation\nb) for the specification submitted"]
[]
[null,null,"P5","Reason for the submission, the need and intended use for the specification"]
[]
[null,null,"P6","If any other evaluation of this specification is known, e.g. by member states or European Commission projects, provide a link to this evaluation."]
[]
[null,null,"P7","State whether this submission concerns:\nA) Identification of a new specification\nB) a revision of an already identified specification \nC) a proposal to withdraw the identification of an already identified specification  "]
[]
[null,null,"P8","If P.7, Case B, applies:\nplease provide information on backward and forward compatibility with the version already approved. "]
[]
[null,null,"P9","If P.7, Case C applies:\nexplain why the ICT specification  no longer complies with the requirements for identification or the reasons for its withdrawal"]
[]
[null,null,"P10","The submitted ICT specification is :\nA) the first ICT specification from this standards developing organisation\nB) an ICT specification coming from a SDO of which a specification has previously been identified and which has undergone the same development and approval processes in the organisation."]
[]
[null,null,"P11","Date of creation"]
[]
[null,null,"P12","Date of last modification"]
[]
[null,null,"P13","Description"]
[]
[null,null,"P14","ID"]
[]
[null,null,"P15","Keywords"]
[]
[null,null,"P16","Asset type"]
[]
[null,null,"P17","Current version"]
[]
[null,null,"P18","Documentation"]
[]
[null,null,"P19","Domain"]
[]
[null,null,"P20","Interoperability level"]
[]
[null,null,"P21","Language"]
[]
[null,null,"P22","Previous version"]
[]
[null,null,"P23","Release"]
[]
[null,null,"P24","Spatial coverage"]
[]
[null,null,"P25","Subject"]
[]
[null,null,"P26","Status"]
[]
[null,null,"P27","Business need(s)/requirements"]
[]
[null,null,null,"CONSIDERATION"]
[null,null,"Nr","Criterion",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"Answer",null,"Justification"]
[null,null,null,"          CORRECTNESS"]
[]
[null,null,"C1","The previous information in this page are correctly provided"]
[]
[null,null,"C2","The complete documentation to perform the assessement is provided"]
[]
[null,null,"C3","The functional area of application for the formal specification is adressing interoperabiity and eGovernment"]
[]
[null,null,null,"           LEGISLATION AND REGULATION"]
[]
[null,null,"C4","The formal specification meets the business needs of public administration"]
[]
[null,null,"C5","The formal specification doesn’t hamper the regulatory requirements for its area of application"]
[]
[null,"Please, fill in the mandatory*information to start the asseement"]

{"sheet":"Sheet1","index":3,"n_rows":0,"n_cols":0,"rows_kept":0,"cut":false,"hidden":true,"merged":[]}

{"sheet":"Assessment_MSP","index":4,"n_rows":84,"n_cols":14,"rows_kept":84,"cut":false,"hidden":true,"merged":[[75,4,75,6],[77,4,77,6],[81,4,81,6],[83,0,83,11],[55,4,55,6],[59,4,59,6],[63,4,63,6],[65,4,65,6],[69,4,69,6],[71,4,71,6],[49,4,49,6],[17,4,17,6],[19,4,19,6],[23,4,23,6],[25,4,25,6],[27,4,27,6],[29,4,29,6],[33,4,33,6],[37,4,37,6],[41,4,41,6],[45,4,45,6],[47,4,47,6],[15,4,15,6],[1,8,1,9],[3,8,3,9],[7,8,7,9],[9,8,9,9],[11,2,11,10]]}
[]
[null,null,null,null,"Date of the Assessment",null,"aaa"]
[]
[null,null,null,null,"SDO/SSO",null,"Gs1 (http://www.gs1.fr/)"]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,null,"Technical specification",null,"aaa"]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,"ID",null,"Criterion",null,null,null,"Answer",null,"Justification"]
[null,null,null,null," MARKET ACCEPTANCE"]
[]
[null,null,"A1",null,"Has the specification been used for different implementations by different vendors/suppliers? "]
[]
[null,null,"A2",null,"Does the implementation of the specification hamper interoperability with the implementation of existing European or international standards? ",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"A3",null,"Are you aware of public references of the respective specification by public authorities (especially policies or in procurements) ?",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,null,null," COHERENCE PRINCIPLE"]
[]
[null,null,"A4",null,"Does the technical specification or standard cover areas different from areas addressed by technical specifications being under consideration to become a European standard? \n(i.e. technical specifications provided by a non-formal standardisation organisation, that is other than CEN, CENELEC or ETSI can be under consideration to become a European standard or alternatively an identified technical specification)",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"A5","a.","Is the adoption of new European Standards which cover the same areas as the proposed specification (or standard) foreseen within a reasonable timeframe? ",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,null,"b.","Are there existing European standards with market uptake which cover the same areas as the proposed specification (or standard) being assessed?",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,null,"c.","If yes, are the existing standards becoming obsolete?"]
[]
[null,null,null,null," ATTRIBUTES"]
[]
[null,null,"A6",null,"Is the standards developing organisation a non-profit making organisation? "]
[]
[null,null,null,null,"                    OPENNESS"]
[]
[null,null,"A7",null,"Is participation in the creation process of the specification open to all interested parties (e.g. organisations, companies or individuals)?",null,null,null,"Yes",null,"The GS1 GSMP is open to all, however, only members can vote and IP waiver has to be signed.  Global Standards Management Process (GSMP) Manual  to agree to grant to GS1 members a royalty-free licence or a RAND licence to Necessary Claim ",null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,null,null,"                    CONSENSUS"]
[]
[null,null,"A8",null,"Are the specifications approved in a decision making process which aims at reaching consensus?",null,null,null,"Yes",null,"For documentation, see: http://www.gs1.org/docs/gsmp/gsmp_manual.pdf. Notice that the decision making process in GSMP clearly aims at reaching consensus."]
[]
[null,null,null,null,"                    TRANSPARENCY"]
[]
[null,null,"A9",null,"Is relevant documentation of the development and approval process of the specification archived and identified?",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"A10",null,"Is information on (new) standardisation activities widely announced through suitable and accessible means?",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"A11",null,"All relevant stakeholders can formally appeal or raise objections to the development and approval of specifications?  ",null,null,null,"Yes",null,"Raise objections to the development and approval of specifications are a possible in the GSMP. For documentation see http://www.gs1.org/docs/gsmp/gsmp_manual.pdf"]
[]
[null,null,null,null," REQUIREMENTS"]
[]
[null,null,null,null,"                    MAINTENANCE"]
[]
[null,null,"A12",null,"Does the specification have a defined maintenance and support process?"]
[]
[null,null,null,null,"                    AVAILABILITY"]
[]
[null,null,"A13",null,"Is the specification publicly available for implementation and use on reasonable terms?"]
[]
[null,null,null,null,"                    INTELECTUAL PROPERTY"]
[]
[null,null,"A14","a.","Is the specification licensed on a (F)RAND basis?"]
[]
[null,null,null,"b.","Is the specification licensed on a royalty-free basis?"]
[]
[null,null,null,null,"                    RELEVANCE"]
[]
[null,null,"A15","a.","Does the  specification address and facilitate interoperability between public administrations?"]
[]
[null,null,null,"b.","Is there evidence that the adoption of the specification positively impacts one or several of the following: organisational processes; the environment; the administrative burden; the disability support; cross-border services, public policy objectives and societal needs ?",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,null,null,"                    NEUTRALITY AND STABILITY"]
[]
[null,null,"A16","a.","Is the specification largely independent from specific vendor products?"]
[]
[null,null,null,"b.","Is the specification largely independent from specific platforms or technologies?"]
[]
[null,null,null,null,"                    QUALITY"]
[]
[null,null,"A17",null,"Has the specification sufficient detail, consistency and completeness for the use and development of products and services?",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
["                             Please respond to all the criteria before viewing the Results "]

{"sheet":"Setup_EIF","index":5,"n_rows":102,"n_cols":20,"rows_kept":102,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,2,16],[10,3,10,5],[10,7,10,16],[6,3,6,5],[6,7,6,16],[8,3,8,5],[8,7,8,16],[12,3,12,5],[12,7,12,16],[14,3,14,5],[14,7,14,16],[16,3,16,5],[16,7,16,16],[18,3,18,5],[18,7,18,16],[20,3,20,5],[20,7,20,16],[22,3,22,5],[22,7,22,16],[24,3,24,5],[24,7,24,16],[26,3,26,5],[26,7,26,16],[28,3,28,5],[28,7,28,16],[30,3,30,5],[30,7,30,16],[32,3,32,5],[32,7,32,16],[36,3,36,5],[36,7,36,16],[38,3,38,5],[38,7,38,16],[40,3,40,5],[40,7,40,16],[42,3,42,5],[42,7,42,16],[44,3,44,5],[44,7,44,16],[46,3,46,5],[46,7,46,16],[48,3,48,5],[48,7,48,16],[50,3,50,5],[50,7,50,16],[52,3,52,5],[52,7,52,16],[54,3,54,5],[54,7,54,16],[56,3,56,5],[56,7,56,16],[58,3,58,5],[58,7,58,16],[60,3,60,5],[60,7,60,16],[62,3,62,5],[62,7,62,16],[64,3,64,5],[64,7,64,16],[66,3,66,5],[66,7,66,16],[68,3,68,5],[68,7,68,16],[70,3,70,5],[70,7,70,16],[72,3,72,5],[72,7,72,16],[74,3,74,5],[74,7,74,16],[76,3,76,5],[76,7,76,16],[78,3,78,5],[78,7,78,16],[80,3,80,5],[80,7,80,16],[82,3,82,5],[82,7,82,16],[84,3,84,5],[84,7,84,16],[98,3,98,9],[101,1,101,17],[86,3,86,5],[86,7,86,16],[88,3,88,5],[88,7,88,16],[94,3,94,9],[96,3,96,9]]}
[null,null,"Please, fill in the mandatory* information to  start the assessment"]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,"INFORMATION ON THE SUBMITTER"]
[]
[null,null,"L1","Last name, First name",null,null,null,"CAMSS Team"]
[]
[null,null,"L2","Organisation",null,null,null,"everis"]
[]
[null,null,"L3","Position / Role"]
[]
[null,null,"L4","Contact address"]
[]
[null,null,"L5","Contact phone number"]
[]
[null,null,"L6","Contact email",null,null,null,"CAMSS@everis.com"]
[]
[null,null,"L7","Date of submission",null,null,"*","2019-10-31"]
[]
[null,null,"L8","Scenario for assessment",null,null,"*","European Interoperability Framework (EIF)"]
[]
[null,null,"L9","Public administration"]
[]
[null,null,"L10","Alternatives considered"]
[]
[null,null,"L11","Process approach"]
[]
[null,null,"L12","Members of Assessment panel "]
[]
[null,null,"L13","Consultation and validation roles"]
[]
[null,null,"L14","Members of decision making body"]
[]
[null,null,null,"INFORMATION ON THE SUBMISSION",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"."]
[]
[null,null,"P1","Title of specification",null,null,"*","File Transfer Protocol (FTP)"]
[]
[null,null,"P2","Address where the version of the specification can be obtained",null,null,null,"https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc959",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"P3","Name and website of the standard developing/setting organisation (SDO/SSO) of the specification",null,null,"*","IETF (https://www.ietf.org/)",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"P4","Contact information/contact person \na) for the organisation\nb) for the specification submitted",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"P5","Reason for the submission, the need and intended use for the specification",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"P6","If any other evaluation of this specification is known, e.g. by member states or European Commission projects, provide a link to this evaluation.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"P7","State whether this submission concerns:\nA) Identification of a new specification\nB) a revision of an already identified specification \nC) a proposal to withdraw the identification of an already identified specification  ",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"P8","If P.7, Case B, applies:\nplease provide information on backward and forward compatibility with the version already approved. ",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"P9","If P.7, Case C applies:\nexplain why the ICT specification  no longer complies with the requirements for identification or the reasons for its withdrawal",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"P10","The submitted ICT specification is :\nA) the first ICT specification from this standards developing organisation\nB) an ICT specification coming from a SDO of which a specification has previously been identified and which has undergone the same development and approval processes in the organisation.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"P11","Date of creation"]
[]
[null,null,"P12","Date of last modification"]
[]
[null,null,"P13","Description"]
[]
[null,null,"P14","ID"]
[]
[null,null,"P15","Keyword"]
[]
[null,null,"P16","Asset type"]
[]
[null,null,"P17","Current version"]
[]
[null,null,"P18","Documentation"]
[]
[null,null,"P19","Domain"]
[]
[null,null,"P20","Interoperability level"]
[]
[null,null,"P21","Language"]
[]
[null,null,"P22","Previous version"]
[]
[null,null,"P23","Release"]
[]
[null,null,"P24","Spatial coverage"]
[]
[null,null,"P25","Subject"]
[]
[null,null,"P26","Status"]
[]
[null,null,"P27","Business need(s)/requirements"]
[]
[null,null,null,"CONSIDERATION"]
[null,null,"ID","Criterion",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"Answer",null,"Justification",null,null,"Justification"]
[null,null,null,"          CORRECTNESS"]
[]
[null,null,"C1","The previous information in this page are correctly provided"]
[]
[null,null,"C2","The complete documentation to perform the assessement is provided"]
[]
[null,null,"C3","The functional area of application for the formal specification is addressing interoperability and eGovernment",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[]
[null,"Please, fill in the mandatory*information to start the assessment"]

{"sheet":"Setup_ODSAT","index":6,"n_rows":0,"n_cols":0,"rows_kept":0,"cut":false,"hidden":true,"merged":[]}

{"sheet":"Assessment_ODSAT","index":7,"n_rows":0,"n_cols":0,"rows_kept":0,"cut":false,"hidden":true,"merged":[]}

{"sheet":"Assessment_EIF","index":8,"n_rows":169,"n_cols":12,"rows_kept":169,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[138,0,138,9],[107,2,107,4],[115,2,115,4],[122,2,122,4],[124,2,124,4],[111,2,111,4],[128,2,128,4],[130,2,130,4],[132,2,132,4],[136,1,136,8],[23,2,23,4],[91,2,91,4],[97,2,97,4],[87,2,87,4],[51,2,51,4],[53,2,53,4],[55,2,55,4],[57,2,57,4],[59,2,59,4],[65,2,65,4],[35,2,35,4],[37,2,37,4],[39,2,39,4],[43,2,43,4],[45,2,45,4],[49,2,49,4],[99,2,99,4],[101,2,101,4],[103,2,103,4],[105,2,105,4],[69,2,69,4],[73,2,73,4],[77,2,77,4],[79,1,79,9],[83,2,83,4],[89,2,89,4],[25,2,25,4],[27,2,27,4],[29,2,29,4],[31,2,31,4],[33,2,33,4],[17,2,17,4],[1,4,1,7],[3,4,3,7],[5,4,5,7],[7,4,7,7],[9,4,9,7],[13,2,13,4]]}
[]
[null,null,"Date of the Assessment",null,"10/31/2019"]
[]
[null,null,"SDO/SSO",null,"IETF (https://www.ietf.org/)"]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Interoperability specification",null,"File Transfer Protocol (FTP)"]
[]
[null,null,"Interoperability specification type"]
[]
[null,"ID","Criterion",null,null,null,"Answer",null,"Justification"]
[]
[null,null,"  PRINCIPLES SETTING THE CONTEXT FOR EU ACTIONS ON INTEROPERABILITY"]
[]
[null,null,"          SUBSIDIARITY AND PROPORTIONALITY"]
[]
[null,"A1","The standard or specification has been included in a national catalogue from a Member State whose NIF is fully aligned with at least 4 out of 5 sections of the EIF according to NIFO factsheets.",null,null,null,"✓",null,"FTP is included in the ICT national catalogues of the Netherlands and Spain. These Member States comply with at least 4 out of 5 sections of the EIF according to the NIFO factsheets.\n\nSee:                                                                                                                                               https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/collection/common-assessment-method-standards-and-specifications-camss/camss-list-standards ",null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"  CORE INTEROPERABILITY PRINCIPLES"]
[]
[null,null,"          OPENNESS"]
[]
[null,"A2","The standard or specification facilitates the publication of public data as open data.",null,null,null,"✓",null,"FTP is an internet protocol for the exchange of data over an Internet network. It supports the first level of maturity defined in the Tim Berners-Lee´s  5 stars Open Data deployment scheme, \"Make your data accessible on the web\". \n\nSee: \nhttps://5stardata.info/en/                                                                                                                                            https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc959"]
[]
[null,"A3","All stakeholders have the opportunity to contribute to the development of the specification ",null,null,null,"✓",null,"IETF has a formal review and approval so that all the relevant stakeholders can formally appeal or raise objections to the development and approval of specifications.\n\nEach distinct version of an Internet standards-related specification is published as part of the \"Request for Comments\" (RFC) document series. This archival series is the official publication channel for Internet standards documents and other publications.\n\nDuring the development of a specification, draft versions of the document are made available for informal review and comment by placing them in the IETF's \"Internet-Drafts\" directory, which is replicated on a number of Internet hosts. This makes an evolving working document readily available to a wide audience, facilitating the process of review and revision.\n\nSee:\nhttps://www.ietf.org/standards/process/ \nhttps://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2026",null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,"A4","A public review is part of the decision-making process.",null,null,null,"✓",null,"IETF is a consensus-based group, and authority to act on behalf of the community requires a high degree of consensus and the continued consent of the community. The process of creating and Internet Standard is straightforward: a specification undergoes a period of development and several iterations of review by the Internet community and revision based upon experience, is adopted as a Standard by the appropriate body... and is published. In practice, the process is more complicated, due to (1) the difficulty of creating specifications of high technical quality; (2) the need to consider the interests of all of the affected parties; (3) the importance of establishing widespread community consensus; and (4) the difficulty of evaluating the utility of a particular specification for the Internet community. The goals of the Internet Standards Process are:\n- Technical excellence;\n- prior implementation and testing;\n- clear, concise, and easily understood documentation;\n- openness and fairness; and \n- timeliness.\nThe goal of technical competence, the requirement for prior implementation and testing, and the need to allow all interested parties to comment all require significant time and effort. The Internet Standards Process is intended to balance these conflicting goals. The process is believed to be as short and simple as possible without sacrificing technical excellence, thorough testing before adoption of a standard, or openness and fairness.\n\nSee:\nhttps://www.ietf.org/standards/process/"]
[]
[null,"A5","The standard or specification is available for everyone to study.",null,null,null,"✓",null,"FTP is publicly available for study and use at no cost on the IETF webpage. \n\nSee:\nhttps://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc959"]
[]
[null,"A6","The standard or specification is licensed on a (F)RAND basis",null,null,null,"✓",null,"Like all the IETF standards, HTTPS is  a free and open technical specification, built on IETF standards and licenses from the Open Web Foundation. FTP is licensed on a F(RAND) basis.\n\nSee:\nhttps://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3668"]
[]
[null,"A7","The standard or specification is licensed on a royalty-free basis",null,null,null,"✓",null,"Like all the IETF standards, HTTPS is  a free and open technical specification, built on IETF standards and licenses from the Open Web Foundation. FTP is therefore licensed on a royalty-free basis.\n\nSee:\nhttps://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3668"]
[]
[null,"A8","The standard or specification is sufficiently mature and has sufficient market acceptance for its use in the development of products and services.",null,null,null,"X",null,"FTP has been widely used for the exchange of data in the past years and  has been supported for long time by most of the web browsers. \n\nHowever FTP is beginning to be considered obsolete by major browser. For instance Google Chrome, a browser having market dominance over the market deprecated the support for FTP and states that ¨Usage of FTP in the browser is sufficiently low that it is no longer viable to invest in improving the existing FTP client¨.\n\nSee: \nhttps://www.chromestatus.com/feature/6246151319715840",null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,"A9","The standard or specification fosters the creation of innovative solutions.",null,null,null,"X",null,"At the time of elaborating this assessment, FTP does not foster the creation of innovative solutions. Since its development in 1971, it has been used in combination with other specifications in order to enhance security (e.g. TLS & SSL). However, even these extensions of FTP are not considered innovative solutions."]
[]
[null,"A10","The standard or specification has a strong support from at least one developer community.",null,null,null,"✓",null,"FTP is developed and maintained by IETF, a widely recognised open international community developing standards to enhance the internet. \n\nSee: \nhttps://www.ietf.org/"]
[]
[null,null,"          TRANSPARENCY"]
[]
[null,"A11","The standard or specification fosters the visibility and comprehensibility of administrative rules, processes, data, services and decision-making of a public administration.",null,null,null,"✓",null,"FTP is used as the main protocol for file exchange  by many public organisations. By allowing public administration to share information with others, it  fosters the visibility of data (e.g. Administrative rules, processes etc.) and facilitates public administrations decision-making. \n\nAn example of implementation supporting this fact would be CIRCABC, a project with the purpose of enhancing the collaboration, communication and document exchange between different European Union's stakeholders. \n\nSee: \nhttps://ec.europa.eu/isa2/sites/isa/files/circabc.pdf \nhttps://circabc.europa.eu/faces/jsp/extension/wai/navigation/container.jsp",null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,"A12","The standard or specification helps ensuring the availability of interfaces with internal information systems of a public administration.",null,null,null,"✓",null,"As a protocol for data exchange, FTP allows the provision of data using an endpoint and therefore makes available interfaces of public administrations internal information systems.\n\nAn example of implementation support this fact would be the Flemish initiative MAGDA. This initiative provides a platform that allows the different administrations to reuse the information contained within their registries. FTP has been selected by MAGDA to enable data exchange between the different administrations. \n\nSee: \nhttps://joinup.ec.europa.eu/solution/magda-platform/about\nhttps://cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/198414/factsheet/en",null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"          REUSABILITY"]
[]
[null,"A13","The standard or specification is reusable beyond the domain for which it was originally developed. ",null,null,null,"✓",null,"As a business domain agnostic specification, FTP, can be used for the exchange of documents addressing any domain.",null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,"A14","The standard has been made available for its reuse by the organisations, administrations, open communities, etc. that developed it.",null,null,null,"✓",null,"The FTP is published as a reusable solution in Joinup, the collaborative platform for Reusable IT Solutions funded by the European Commission. \n\nSee: \nhttps://joinup.ec.europa.eu/solution/file-transfer-protocol/distribution/file-transfer-protocol",null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"          TECHNOLOGICAL NEUTRALITY AND DATA PORTABILITY"]
[]
[null,"A15","The standard or specification is independent from any specific technology and/or platform.",null,null,null,"X",null,"IETF is a vendor neutral SDO. However, FTP relies on TCP to ensure that all data exchanged is sent correctly to the proper destination.\n\nSee:\nhttps://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc959\nhttps://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc793"]
[]
[null,"A16","The standard or specification is proportionate to the needs of its users (citizens, businesses or administrations).",null,null,null,"X",null,"FTP is known to negatively impact the scalability of systems using it. The protocol faces problems when transferring high volumes of data.\n\nSee: \nhttps://sapinsider.wispubs.com/Assets/Articles/2012/January/Using-FTP-Know-The-Risks",null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,"A17","The standard or specification fosters data portability between systems and applications supporting the implementation and evolution of European public services when legally possible.",null,null,null,"✓",null,"The purpose of FTP is to allow the exchange of documents between systems and applications. ",null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"PRINCIPLES RELATED TO GENERIC USER NEEDS AND EXPECTATIONS"]
[]
[null,null,"          USER-CENTRICITY"]
[]
[null,"A18","The standard or specification eases the implementation of the once-only principle.",null,null,null,"✓",null,"FTP allows public administration to exchange information and therefore to avoid requesting standard information to citizens or businesses several times. \n\nFTP is used by MAGA, an initiative from the Flemish Region of Belgium  consisting in a common platform for data reuse between administrations.\n\nSee: \nhttps://joinup.ec.europa.eu/solution/magda-platform/about\n"]
[]
[null,null,"          INCLUSION AND ACCESSIBILITY"]
[]
[null,"A19","The standard or specification fosters e-accessibility.",null,null,null,"N/A",null,"The purpose of FTP is not related to  e-accessibility. Therefore this criterion is considered not applicable to this specification."]
[]
[null,null,"          SECURITY AND PRIVACY"]
[]
[null,"A20","The specification fosters the secure and trustworthy data exchange between citizens and businesses, and public administrations.",null,null,null,"X",null,"FTP is a protocol exclusively designed for the  transfer of files which does not secure the traffic.\n\nHowever,  there are existing extensions of FTP that secure the information delivery. For instance,  FTP over TLS, known as FTPS, uses the Transport Layer Security (TLS) to secure FTP communications over a network.\n\nSee: \nhttps://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc959 \nhttps://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4217",null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"          MULTILINGUALISM"]
[]
[null,"A21","The standard or specification fosters the delivery of multilingual European public services.",null,null,null,"N/A",null,"The purpose of FTP is not related to the delivery of multilingual European public services. Therefore this criterion is considered not applicable specification."]
[]
[null,"  FOUNDATION PRINCIPLES FOR COOPERATION AMONG PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIONS"]
[]
[null,null,"          ADMINISTRATIVE SIMPLIFICATION"]
[]
[null,"A22","The adoption of the standard or specification reduces the administrative burden.",null,null,null,"✓",null,"As  protocol for data exchange, FTP can be used for the exchange of documents solving administrative burden. Additionally, it can avoid the exchange of non-digital documents that are generally source of administrative burden.\n\nSee: \nhttps://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc959 ",null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"          PRESERVATION OF INFORMATION"]
[]
[null,"A23","The standard or specification fosters the long-term preservation of electronic records and other kinds of information.",null,null,null,"N/A",null,"The purpose of FTP is not related to long term preservation of electronic records. Therefore this criterion is considered not applicable to this specification",null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"          ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTIVENESS AND EFFICIENCY"]
[]
[null,"A24","There are already existing studies or documentation assessing the standard or specification in terms of effectiveness and efficiency.",null,null,null,"✓",null,"There are several studies assessing the adoption, strengths, weaknesses, effectiveness and efficiency of FTP.\n\nSee: \nhttps://dzone.com/articles/potential-downsides-of-using-an-ftp-solution \nhttps://themanifest.com/development/how-evaluate-your-file-transfer-protocol-system \nhttps://sapinsider.wispubs.com/Assets/Articles/2012/January/Using-FTP-Know-The-Risks ",null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"INTEROPERABILITY LAYERS"]
[]
[null,null,"           INTEROPERABILITY GOVERNANCE"]
[]
[null,"A25","The standard or specification can be mapped to the EIRA.",null,null,null,"✓",null,"FTP is already associated to EIRA ABBs in the European Library Of Specifications (ELIS). More specifically, FTP can define the interoperability aspects of the \"Network\",  \"Network Service\", \"Private Network\" and \"Public Network\" ABBs of the EIRA Technical View.\n\nSee: \nhttps://joinup.ec.europa.eu/solution/elis/distribution/eliscataloguev100betaxlsx"]
[]
[null,"A26","Mechanisms to assess conformity of the implementations of the standard or specification (e.g. conformity tests, certifications) are available for free.",null,null,null,"X",null,"No tools assessing the conformity of implementations with the specification have been found\n\nHowever, there are tools developed by the FTP community assessing FTP servers performance. \n\nSee: \nhttps://ftptest.net/",null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,"A27","The standard or specification is recommended by a EU Member State.",null,null,null,"✓",null,"6 Member States are recommending FTP in their ICT Catalogues. \n\nSee: \nhttps://joinup.ec.europa.eu/collection/common-assessment-method-standards-and-specifications-camss/camss-list-standards "]
[]
[null,"A28","The standard or specification has been selected for its use in a EU cross-border project or initiative after agreed identification and assessment.",null,null,null,"✓",null,"The FTP is used in the context of the CIRCABC, a cross-border initiative that provides a web application enabling collaboration, communication and document exchange between European Union stakeholders. \n\nSee: \nhttps://ec.europa.eu/isa2/sites/isa/files/circabc.pdf \nhttps://circabc.europa.eu/faces/jsp/extension/wai/navigation/container.jsp",null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,"A29","The standard or specification is included in a catalogue of standards at national level.",null,null,null,"✓",null,"6 Member States are recommending FTP in their ICT Catalogues. \n\nSee CAMSS List of Standards:\nhttps://joinup.ec.europa.eu/collection/common-assessment-method-standards-and-specifications-camss/camss-list-standards "]
[]
[null,"A30","The standard or specification is included in a catalogue of standards at EU level.",null,null,null,"✓",null,"The rules on European standardisation allow the European Commission to identify information and communication technology (ICT) technical specifications - that are not national, European or international standards - to be eligible for referencing in public procurement. This allows public authorities to make use of the full range of specifications when buying IT hardware, software and services, allowing for more competition in the field and reducing the risk of lock-in to proprietary systems.\n\nAfter being evaluated compliant with the regulation on standardisation 1025/2012, FTP has been identified by Commission Implementing Decision and included in the European list of ICT Standards for e-procurement.\n\nSee: \nhttps://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/policy/ict-standardisation/ict-technical-specifications_en "]
[]
[null,null,"INTEGRATED PUBLIC SERVICE GOVERNANCE"]
[]
[null,"A31","The standard or specification is included in an interoperability agreement established between organisations involved in European public service provision.",null,null,null,"✓",null,"The rules on European standardisation allow the European Commission to identify information and communication technology (ICT) technical specifications - that are not national, European or international standards - to be eligible for referencing in public procurement. This allows public authorities to make use of the full range of specifications when buying IT hardware, software and services, allowing for more competition in the field and reducing the risk of lock-in to proprietary systems.\n\nAfter being evaluated compliant with the regulation on standardisation 1025/2012, FTP has been identified by Commission Implementing Decision. During the evaluation process, all the Member States are invited to share their doubts. The positive evaluation of FTP and its identification is considered an interoperability agreement.\n\nSee: \nhttps://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/policy/ict-standardisation/ict-technical-specifications_en ",null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"           LEGAL INTEROPERABILITY"]
[]
[null,"A32","The standard or specification is compliant with a European standardisation regulation (e.g. regulation 1025/2012 on European standardisation).",null,null,null,"✓",null,"The rules on European standardisation allow the European Commission to identify information and communication technology (ICT) technical specifications - that are not national, European or international standards - to be eligible for referencing in public procurement. This allows public authorities to make use of the full range of specifications when buying IT hardware, software and services, allowing for more competition in the field and reducing the risk of lock-in to proprietary systems.\n\nAfter being evaluated compliant with the regulation on standardisation 1025/2012, FTP has been identified by Commission Implementing Decision.\n\nSee: \nhttps://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/policy/ict-standardisation/ict-technical-specifications_en ",null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"         ORGANISATIONAL INTEROPERABILITY"]
[]
[null,null,"✓"]
[null,null,"X"]
[null,null,"N/A"]
[null,"A33","The standard or specification is a commonly accepted business process modelling standard or specification.",null,null,null,"N/A",null,"The purpose of FTP is not related  to the modelling of business processes. Therefore, this criterion is not applicable to the specification.",null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,"A34","The standard or specification defines organisational interoperability aspects (e.g. skills, language, etc.).",null,null,null,"N/A",null,"The purpose of FTP is not related to organisational interoperability. Therefore, this criterion is not applicable to the specification.",null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"         SEMANTIC INTEROPERABILITY"]
[]
[null,"A35","The standard or specification defines a cross-sector reusable data model.",null,null,null,"N/A",null,"The purpose of FTP is not related to the definition of a data model. Therefore this criterion is not applicable to this specification. \n\nSee: \nhttps://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc959"]
[]
[null,"A36","The standard or specification fosters the publication of data as Linked Open Data.",null,null,null,"✓",null,"FTP is an internet protocol for the exchange of data over an Internet network. It supports the first level of maturity defined in the Tim Berners-Lee´s  5 stars Open Data deployment scheme, \"Make your data accessible on the web\". \n\nSee: https://www.w3c.es/Eventos/2013/Uruguay/Presentaciones/W3CdayMVD_LOD_LorenaEtcheverry2013.pdf"]
[]
[null,"A37","The standard or specification is available for free on at least one national or European platform.",null,null,null,"✓",null,"FTP is published on Joinup, the collaborative platform for reusable IT Solutions funded by the European Commission.\n\nSee:\nhttps://joinup.ec.europa.eu/solution/file-transfer-protocol/distribution/file-transfer-protocol"]
[]
[null,null,"           TECHNICAL INTEROPERABILITY"]
[]
[null," This interoperability layer is covered by criteria A2-A10, corresponding to the core interoperability principle ''Openness'' "]
[]
["                             Please respond to all the criteria before viewing the Results "]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,"✓"]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,"X"]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,"N/A"]

{"sheet":"Assessment_TS","index":9,"n_rows":159,"n_cols":14,"rows_kept":159,"cut":false,"hidden":true,"merged":[[14,3,14,5],[1,5,1,8],[3,5,3,8],[7,5,7,8],[5,5,5,8],[9,5,9,8],[16,3,16,5],[18,3,18,5],[20,3,20,5],[22,3,22,5],[24,3,24,5],[26,3,26,5],[30,3,30,5],[32,3,32,5],[34,3,34,5],[36,3,36,5],[38,3,38,5],[39,3,39,5],[39,6,41,6],[40,3,40,5],[42,3,42,5],[46,3,46,5],[48,3,48,5],[52,3,52,5],[54,3,54,5],[58,3,58,5],[62,3,62,5],[64,3,64,5],[66,3,66,5],[68,3,68,5],[70,3,70,5],[72,3,72,5],[78,3,78,5],[80,3,80,5],[82,3,82,5],[84,3,84,5],[88,3,88,5],[92,3,92,5],[94,3,94,5],[96,3,96,5],[100,3,100,5],[102,3,102,5],[104,3,104,5],[106,3,106,5],[108,3,108,5],[110,3,110,5],[112,3,112,5],[114,3,114,5],[116,3,116,5],[118,3,118,5],[120,3,120,5],[122,3,122,5],[126,3,126,5],[128,3,128,5],[132,3,132,5],[144,3,144,5],[146,0,146,10],[134,3,134,5],[136,3,136,5],[138,3,138,5],[140,3,140,5],[142,3,142,5]]}
[]
[null,null,null,"Date of the Assessment",null,"das"]
[]
[null,null,null,"SDO/SSO"]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,"Title of specification",null,"jk"]
[]
[null,null,null,"Type of specification"]
[]
[null,null,"ID","Criterion",null,null,null,"Answer",null,"Justification"]
[null,null,null," MARKET ACCEPTANCE"]
[]
[null,null,"A1","The technical specification or standard has been used for different implementations by different vendors/suppliers.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"A2","The implementation of the technical specification or standard does not hamper interoperability with implementations that are currently based on existing European or international standards.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"A3","There are public references (especially policies or in procurement) of the respective specification made by public authorities.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"A4","The technical specification or standard has been used in different industries, business sectors and/or functions.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"A5","The products that implement the technical specification or standard has a certain or even significant market share of adoption.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"A6","The products that implement the technical specification or standard targets a broad spectrum of end-users.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"A7","The technical specification or standard has a strong support from at least one interest group."]
[]
[null,null,null," COHERENCE PRINCIPLE"]
[]
[null,null,"A8","The technical specification or standard covers areas different from the areas that are already addressed by technical specifications being under consideration to become European standards.\n(i.e. technical specifications provided by a non-formal standardisation organisation, that is other than CEN, CENELEC or ETSI can be under consideration to become a European standard or alternatively an identified technical specification)",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"A9    a."," The adoption of new European standards that cover the same areas as the proposed technical specification or standard is not foreseen.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"         b. ","There are no existing European standards with market uptake that cover the same areas as the proposed technical specification or standard being assessed.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,null,"The response to the criteria \"b\" is \"X\" and the existing European standards are becoming obsolete"]
[]
[null,null,"A10","The technical specification or standard is based on one or more relevant international standards."]
[]
[null,null,"A11","The technical specification or standard is listed as recommended by at least one Member State or a European institution.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"A12","The technical specification or standard is listed as mandatory by at least one Member State or a European institution.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,null,"ATTRIBUTES"]
[]
[null,null,"A13","The standards definition/development/setting organisation is a non-profit making organisation."]
[]
[null,null,"A14","Information on the terms and policies for the establishment and operation of the standardisation organisation is publicly available.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,null,"          OPENNESS"]
[]
[null,null,"A15","Participation in the process of definition of the technical specification is open to all interested parties (e.g. organisations, companies or individuals). "]
[]
[null,null,"A16","The technical specification or standard is reviewed using a formal review process involving all the relevant external stakeholders (e.g. public consultation).",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,null,"          CONSENSUS"]
[]
[null,null,"A17","The standards development/setting organisation approves all the technical specifications and/or standards in a decision making process aiming to reach consensus."]
[]
[null,null,null,"          TRANSPARENCY"]
[]
[null,null,"A18","Relevant documentation of the development and approval process of the specification is archived and identified.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"A19","Information on (new) standardisation activities is widely announced through suitable and accessible means.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"A20","Relevant stakeholders can formally appeal or raise objections to the development and approval of specifications."]
[]
[null,null,"A21","Information on the standardisation process is publicly available."]
[]
[null,null,"A22","Information on the decision making process for approving the technical specification or standard is publicly available."]
[]
[null,null,"A23","Relevant documentation of the development and approval process of the technical specification or standard is publicly available (e.g. preliminary results, committee meeting notes)."]
[]
[null,null,null,"REQUIREMENTS"]
[]
[null,null,null,"          MAINTENANCE"]
[]
[null,null,"A24","The specification has a defined maintenance and support process."]
[]
[null,null,"A25","The technical specification or standard has a defined maintenance organisation."]
[]
[null,null,"A26","The maintenance organisation for the technical specification or standard has sufficient finances and resources to ensure its freedom from short- to medium-term threats.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"A27","The technical specification or standard has a defined policy for version management."]
[]
[null,null,null,"          AVAILABILITY"]
[]
[null,null,"A28","The specification is publicly available for implementation and use on reasonable terms."]
[]
[null,null,null,"          INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY"]
[]
[null,null,"A29  a.","The technical specification or standard is licensed on on a proven/well-motivaded  non-discriminatory basis.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"          b. ","The technical specification or standard is licensed on a royalty-free basis."]
[]
[null,null,"A30","The documentation of the IPR for technical specification or standard is publicly available (there is a clear and complete set of licence terms).",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,null,"          RELEVANCE"]
[]
[null,null,"A31  a. ","The technical specification or standard addresses and facilitates interoperability between public administrations.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"         b."," The adoption of the technical specification or standard positively impacts on one or several of the following: organisational processes; the environment; the administrative burden; the disability support; cross-border services, public policy objectives and societal needs.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"A32","The technical specification or standard addresses, facilitates or is an enabler of eGovernment."]
[]
[null,null,"A33","The functional and non-functional requirements for the use and implementation of the technical specification or standard are clearly defined.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"A34","The technical specification or standard is applicable and extensible for implementations in different domains.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"A35","The technical specification or standard provides added value compared to alternative technical specifications or standards in the same area of application.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"A36","The technical specification or standard is largely compatible with related (not alternative) technical specification or standards in the same area of application.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"A37","There is evidence that the adoption of the technical specification or standard makes it easier to migrate between different solutions from different providers.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"A38","There is evidence that the adoption of the technical specification or standard positively impacts the financial costs.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"A39","There is evidence that the adoption of the technical specification or standard positively impacts any aspect of the security (e.g. data integrity, data authenticity, data transmission or communications, data preservation, cyber threats, penetration, any other aspect related to the security of the information system or interoperability).",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"A40","There is evidence that the adoption of the technical specification or standard positively impacts privacy."]
[]
[null,null,"A41","The risks related to the adoption of the technical specification or standard are acceptable."]
[]
[null,null,null,"          NEUTRALITY AND STABILITY"]
[]
[null,null,"A42  a.","The technical specification is independent from specific vendor products."]
[]
[null,null,"         b.","The technical specification is independent from specific platforms or technologies."]
[]
[null,null,null,"          QUALITY"]
[]
[null,null,"A43","The specification has sufficient completeness and consistency for the use and development of products and services.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"A44","The technical specification or standard is considered mature in the sense that it has overcome most of its initial problems and is considered developed sufficiently (i.e. it fits its purpose).",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"A45","There are existing or planned mechanisms to assess conformity of the implementations of the technical specification or standard (e.g. conformity tests, certifications).",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"A46","The technical specification or standard provides implementation guidelines and documentation for the implementation of products.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
[null,null,"A47","The technical specification or standard provides an open source reference implementation."]
[]
[null,null,"A48","The technical specification or standard addresses backward compatibility with previous versions."]
[]
[null,null,"A49","The underlying technologies for implementing the technical specification or standard have been clearly defined, are stable and have been tested.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"MIN"]
[]
["                             Please respond to all the criteria before viewing the Results "]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,"✓"]
[null,null,null,"X"]
[null,null,null,"N/A"]

{"sheet":"Results","index":10,"n_rows":45,"n_cols":13,"rows_kept":45,"cut":false,"hidden":true,"merged":[[0,0,0,16383],[25,0,25,3],[25,4,25,7],[44,0,44,1022],[45,0,46,1022],[4,4,4,8],[6,4,6,8],[8,4,8,8],[23,0,23,3],[23,4,23,7],[2,4,2,8]]}
["CAMSS Results - MSP Scenario"]
[]
[null,null,"Date of the Assessment",null,"d"]
[]
[null,null,"SDO/SSO",null,"Gs1 (http://www.gs1.fr/)"]
[]
[null,null,"Title of specification",null,"d"]
[]
[null,null,"Type of specification"]
[]
[null,null,null,null,"Automated Score",null,"CAMSS Assessment Strength",null,"#Favorable",null,"#Unfavorable",null,"#Not Applicable"]
[null,null,"MARKET ACCEPTANCE",null,0,null,0,null,0,null,0,null,0]
[]
[null,null,"COHERENCE PRINCIPLE",null,0,null,0,null,0,null,0,null,0]
[]
[null,null,"ATTRIBUTES",null,1,null,0.5,null,3,null,0,null,0]
[]
[null,null,"REQUIREMENTS",null,0,null,0,null,0,null,0,null,0]
[]
[]
[null,null,"OVERALL SCORE",null,0.25,null,0.125,null,3,null,0,null,0]
[]
[]
["Proposed classification:               "]
[]
["Justification for classification:               "]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,null,"Category","Positive/answered","Negative/answered","Variables represented:"]
[null,null,null,null,"Market acceptance",{"$f":"E12*G12","v":0},{"$f":"G12*(1-E12)","v":0},{"$f":"1-G12","v":1}]
[null,null,null,null,"Coherence principle",{"$f":"E14*G14","v":0},{"$f":"G14*(1-E14)","v":0},{"$f":"1-G14","v":1}]
[null,null,null,null,"Attributes",{"$f":"E16*G16","v":0.5},{"$f":"G16*(1-E16)","v":0},{"$f":"1-G16","v":0.5}]
[null,null,null,null,"Requirements",{"$f":"E18*G18","v":0},{"$f":"G18*(1-E18)","v":0},{"$f":"1-G18","v":1}]
[null,null,null,null,"Overall score",{"$f":"E21*G21","v":3.125E-2},{"$f":"G21*(1-E21)","v":9.375E-2},{"$f":"1-G21","v":0.875}]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
["The automated score represents how the technical specification can perform as a standard according to CAMSS. It also represents the percentage of “positive” answers out of all the answers.\n\nThe CAMSS assessment strength represents how accurate the assessment of the technical specification is. It represents the percentage of “positive” And “negative” answers out of all the answers."]

{"sheet":"ResultsTS","index":11,"n_rows":21,"n_cols":13,"rows_kept":21,"cut":false,"hidden":true,"merged":[]}
["          CAMSS Results"]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,null,"Automated Score",null,"CAMSS Assessment Strength",null,"#Favorable",null,"#Unfavorable",null,"#Not Applicable"]
[null,null,"MARKET ACCEPTANCE",null,{"$f":"IF(G12>0,(COUNTIF(Assessment_TS!H15:H27,\"✓\"))/((COUNTIF(Assessment_TS!H15:H27,\"X\"))+(COUNTIF(Assessment_TS!H15:H27,\"✓\"))),0)","v":0},null,{"$f":"(COUNTIF(Assessment_TS!H15:H27,\"✓\")+COUNTIF(Assessment_TS!H15:H27,\"X\"))/7","v":0},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_TS!H15:H27,\"✓\")","v":0},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_TS!H15:H27,\"X\")","v":0},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_TS!H15:H27,\"N/A\")","v":0}]
[]
[null,null,"COHERENCE PRINCIPLE",null,{"$f":"IF(G14>0,(COUNTIF(Assessment_TS!H31:H43,\"✓\"))/((COUNTIF(Assessment_TS!H31:H43,\"X\"))+(COUNTIF(Assessment_TS!H31:H43,\"✓\"))),0)","v":0},null,{"$f":"(COUNTIF(Assessment_TS!H31:H43,\"✓\")+COUNTIF(Assessment_TS!H31:H43,\"X\"))/6","v":0},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_TS!H31:H43,\"✓\")","v":0},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_TS!H31:H43,\"X\")","v":0},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_TS!H31:H43,\"N/A\")","v":0}]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,{"$f":"(COUNTIF(Assessment_TS!H31:H43,\"✓\")+COUNTIF(Assessment_TS!H31:H43,\"X\"))/6","v":0}]
[null,null,"ATTRIBUTES",null,{"$f":"IF(G16>0,(COUNTIF(Assessment_TS!H47:H73,\"✓\"))/((COUNTIF(Assessment_TS!H47:H73,\"X\"))+(COUNTIF(Assessment_TS!H47:H73,\"✓\"))),0)","v":0},null,{"$f":"(COUNTIF(Assessment_TS!H47:H73,\"✓\")+COUNTIF(Assessment_TS!H47:H73,\"X\"))/11","v":0},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_TS!H47:H73,\"✓\")","v":0},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_TS!H47:H73,\"X\")","v":0},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_TS!H47:H73,\"N/A\")","v":0}]
[]
[null,null,"REQUIREMENTS",null,{"$f":"IF(G18>0,(COUNTIF(Assessment_TS!H79:H145,\"✓\"))/((COUNTIF(Assessment_TS!H79:H145,\"X\"))+(COUNTIF(Assessment_TS!H79:H145,\"✓\"))),0)","v":0},null,{"$f":"(COUNTIF(Assessment_TS!H79:H145,\"✓\")+COUNTIF(Assessment_TS!H79:H145,\"X\"))/29","v":0},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_TS!H79:H145,\"✓\")","v":0},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_TS!H79:H145,\"X\")","v":0},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_TS!H79:H145,\"N/A\")","v":0}]
[]
[]
[null,null,"OVERALL SCORE",null,{"$f":"IF(G21>0,(COUNTIF(Assessment_TS!H15:H145,\"✓\"))/((COUNTIF(Assessment_TS!H15:H145,\"X\"))+(COUNTIF(Assessment_TS!H15:H145,\"✓\"))),0)","v":0},null,{"$f":"(COUNTIF(Assessment_TS!H15:H145,\"✓\")+COUNTIF(Assessment_TS!H15:H145,\"X\"))/53","v":0},null,{"$f":"SUM(I12:I18)","v":0},null,{"$f":"SUM(K12:K18)","v":0},null,{"$f":"SUM(M12:M18)","v":0}]

{"sheet":"ResultsMSP","index":12,"n_rows":21,"n_cols":13,"rows_kept":21,"cut":false,"hidden":true,"merged":[]}
["          CAMSS Results"]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,null,"Automated Score",null,"CAMSS Assessment Strength",null,"#Favorable",null,"#Unfavorable",null,"#Not Applicable"]
[null,null,"MARKET ACCEPTANCE",null,{"$f":"IF(G12>0,SUM(COUNTIF(Assessment_MSP!I16,\"Yes\"),COUNTIF(Assessment_MSP!I18,\"No\"),COUNTIF(Assessment_MSP!I20,\"Yes\")) / (COUNTIF(Assessment_MSP!I16:I20,\"Yes\")+COUNTIF(Assessment_MSP!I16:I20,\"No\")),0)","v":0},null,{"$f":"(COUNTIF(Assessment_MSP!I16:I20,\"Yes\")+COUNTIF(Assessment_MSP!I16:I20,\"No\"))/3","v":0},null,{"$f":"SUM(COUNTIF(Assessment_MSP!I16, \"Yes\"),COUNTIF(Assessment_MSP!I18, \"No\"),COUNTIF(Assessment_MSP!I20, \"Yes\"))","v":0},null,{"$f":"SUM(COUNTIF(Assessment_MSP!I16, \"No\"),COUNTIF(Assessment_MSP!I18, \"Yes\"),COUNTIF(Assessment_MSP!I20, \"No\"))","v":0},null,{"$f":"(COUNTIF(Assessment_MSP!I16:I20,\"N/A\"))","v":0}]
[]
[null,null,"COHERENCE PRINCIPLE",null,{"$f":"IF(G14>0,SUM(COUNTIF(Assessment_MSP!I24,\"Yes\"),COUNTIF(Assessment_MSP!I26:I28,\"No\"),COUNTIF(Assessment_MSP!I30,\"Yes\")) / (COUNTIF(Assessment_MSP!I24:I30,\"Yes\") + COUNTIF(Assessment_MSP!I24:I30,\"No\")),0%)","v":0},null,{"$f":"(COUNTIF(Assessment_MSP!I24:I30,\"Yes\")+COUNTIF(Assessment_MSP!I24:I30,\"No\"))/3","v":0},null,{"$f":"SUM(COUNTIF(Assessment_MSP!I24, \"Yes\"),COUNTIF(Assessment_MSP!I26:I28, \"No\"),COUNTIF(Assessment_MSP!I30,\"Yes\"))","v":0},null,{"$f":"SUM(COUNTIF(Assessment_MSP!I24, \"No\"),COUNTIF(Assessment_MSP!I26:I28, \"Yes\"),COUNTIF(Assessment_MSP!I30,\"No\"))","v":0},null,{"$f":"(COUNTIF(Assessment_MSP!I24:I30,\"N/A\"))","v":0}]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,{"$f":"(COUNTIF(Assessment_MSP!I24:I30,\"Yes\")+COUNTIF(Assessment_MSP!I24:I30,\"No\"))/4","v":0}]
[null,null,"ATTRIBUTES",null,{"$f":"IF(G16>0,SUM(COUNTIF(Assessment_MSP!I34:I50,\"Yes\")) / ( COUNTIF(Assessment_MSP!I34:I50,\"Yes\") + COUNTIF(Assessment_MSP!I34:I50,\"No\")),0%)","v":1},null,{"$f":"(COUNTIF(Assessment_MSP!I34:I50,\"Yes\") + COUNTIF(Assessment_MSP!I34:I50,\"No\"))/6","v":0.5},null,{"$f":"(COUNTIF(Assessment_MSP!I34:I50,\"Yes\"))","v":3},null,{"$f":"(COUNTIF(Assessment_MSP!I34:I50,\"No\"))","v":0},null,{"$f":"(COUNTIF(Assessment_MSP!I34:I50,\"N/A\"))","v":0}]
[]
[null,null,"REQUIREMENTS",null,{"$f":"IF(G18>0,SUM(COUNTIF(Assessment_MSP!I56:I82,\"Yes\")) / ( COUNTIF(Assessment_MSP!I56:I82,\"Yes\") + COUNTIF(Assessment_MSP!I56:I82,\"No\")),0%)","v":0},null,{"$f":"(COUNTIF(Assessment_MSP!I56:I82,\"Yes\") + COUNTIF(Assessment_MSP!I56:I82,\"No\"))/9","v":0},null,{"$f":"(COUNTIF(Assessment_MSP!I56:I82,\"Yes\"))","v":0},null,{"$f":"(COUNTIF(Assessment_MSP!I56:I82,\"No\"))","v":0},null,{"$f":"(COUNTIF(Assessment_MSP!I56:I82,\"N/A\"))","v":0}]
[]
[]
[null,null,"OVERALL SCORE",null,{"$f":"SUM(E12:E18)/4","v":0.25},null,{"$f":"SUM(G12:G18)/4","v":0.125},null,{"$f":"SUM(I12:I18)","v":3},null,{"$f":"SUM(K12:K18)","v":0},null,{"$f":"SUM(M12:M18)","v":0}]

{"sheet":"Results ","index":13,"n_rows":102,"n_cols":16,"rows_kept":102,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[66,15,67,15],[64,2,64,12],[66,17,67,17],[0,0,0,13],[101,2,101,12],[2,4,2,11],[4,4,4,11],[6,4,6,11],[8,4,8,11],[66,2,67,2],[66,4,67,4],[66,12,67,12],[66,10,67,10],[66,8,67,8],[66,6,67,6]]}
["CAMSS Results - EIF Scenario"]
[]
[null,null,"  Date of the Assessment",null,"2019-10-31"]
[]
[null,null,"  SDO/SSO",null,"IETF (https://www.ietf.org/)"]
[]
[null,null,"Interoperability specification",null,"File Transfer Protocol (FTP)"]
[]
[null,null,"Interoperability specification type"]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,null,"Automated Score",null,"Assessment Strength",null,"#Favorable",null,"#Unfavorable",null,"#Not \nApplicable"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"SUBSIDIARITY AND PROPORTIONALITY",null,{"$f":"IF(G15>0,(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G18,\"✓\"))/((COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G18,\"X\"))+(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G18,\"✓\"))),0)","v":1},null,{"$f":"(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G18,\"✓\")+COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G18,\"X\"))/1","v":1},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G18,\"✓\")","v":1},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G18,\"X\")","v":0},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G18,\"N/A\")","v":0}]
[]
[null,null,"PRINCIPLE SETTING THE CONTEXT FOR EU ACTIONS ON INTEROPERABILITY",null,{"$f":"IF(G17>0,(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G18,\"✓\"))/((COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G18,\"X\"))+(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G18,\"✓\"))),0)","v":1},null,{"$f":"(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G18,\"✓\")+COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G18,\"X\"))/1","v":1},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G18,\"✓\")","v":1},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G18,\"X\")","v":0},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G18,\"N/A\")","v":0}]
[]
[]
[null,null,"OPENNESS",null,{"$f":"IF(G20>0,(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G24:G40,\"✓\"))/((COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G24:G40,\"X\"))+(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G24:G40,\"✓\"))),0)","v":0.77777777777777779},null,{"$f":"(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G24:G40,\"✓\")+COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G24:G40,\"X\"))/9","v":1},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G24:G40,\"✓\")","v":7},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G24:G40,\"X\")","v":2},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G24:G40,\"N/A\")","v":0}]
[]
[null,null,"TRANSPARENCY",null,{"$f":"IF(G22>0,(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G44:G46,\"✓\"))/((COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G44:G46,\"X\"))+(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G44:G46,\"✓\"))),0)","v":1},null,{"$f":"(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G44:G46,\"✓\")+COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G44:G46,\"X\"))/2","v":1},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G44:G46,\"✓\")","v":2},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G44:G46,\"X\")","v":0},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G44:G46,\"N/A\")","v":0}]
[]
[null,null,"REUSABILITY",null,{"$f":"IF(G24>0,(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G50:G52,\"✓\"))/((COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G50:G52,\"X\"))+(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G50:G52,\"✓\"))),0)","v":1},null,{"$f":"(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G50:G52,\"✓\")+COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G50:G52,\"X\"))/2","v":1},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G50:G52,\"✓\")","v":2},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G50:G52,\"X\")","v":0},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G50:G52,\"N/A\")","v":0}]
[]
[null,null,"TECHNOLOGICAL NEUTRALITY AND DATA PORTABILITY",null,{"$f":"IF(G26>0,(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G56:G60,\"✓\"))/((COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G56:G60,\"X\"))+(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G56:G60,\"✓\"))),0)","v":0.33333333333333331},null,{"$f":"(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G56:G60,\"✓\")+COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G56:G60,\"X\"))/3","v":1},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G56:G60,\"✓\")","v":1},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G56:G60,\"X\")","v":2},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G56:G60,\"N/A\")","v":0},null,null,1]
[]
[null,null," CORE INTEROPERABILITY PRINCIPLES",null,{"$f":"IF(G28>0,(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G24:G60,\"✓\"))/((COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G24:G60,\"X\"))+(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G24:G60,\"✓\"))),0)","v":0.75},null,{"$f":"(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G24:G60,\"✓\")+COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G24:G60,\"X\"))/16","v":1},null,{"$f":"SUM(I20,I22,I24,I26)","v":12},null,{"$f":"SUM(K20,K22,K24,K26)","v":4},null,{"$f":"SUM(M20,M22,M24,M26)","v":0}]
[]
[]
[null,null,"USER-CENTRICITY",null,{"$f":"IF(G31>0,(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G66,\"✓\"))/((COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G66,\"X\"))+(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G66,\"✓\"))),0)","v":1},null,{"$f":"(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G66,\"✓\")+COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G66,\"X\"))/1","v":1},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G66,\"✓\")","v":1},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G66,\"X\")","v":0},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G66,\"N/A\")","v":0}]
[]
[null,null,"INCLUSION AND ACCESSIBILITY",null,{"$f":"IF(G33>0,(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G70,\"✓\"))/((COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G70,\"X\"))+(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G70,\"✓\"))),0)","v":0},null,{"$f":"(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G70,\"✓\")+COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G70,\"X\"))/1","v":0},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G70,\"✓\")","v":0},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G70,\"X\")","v":0},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G70,\"N/A\")","v":1}]
[]
[null,null,"SECURITY AND PRIVACY",null,{"$f":"IF(G35>0,(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G74,\"✓\"))/((COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G74,\"X\"))+(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G74,\"✓\"))),0)","v":0},null,{"$f":"(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G74,\"✓\")+COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G74,\"X\"))/1","v":1},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G74,\"✓\")","v":0},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G74,\"X\")","v":1},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G74,\"N/A\")","v":0}]
[]
[null,null,"MULTILINGUALISM",null,{"$f":"IF(G37>0,(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G78,\"✓\"))/((COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G78,\"X\"))+(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G78,\"✓\"))),0)","v":0},null,{"$f":"(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G78,\"✓\")+COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G78,\"X\"))/1","v":0},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G78,\"✓\")","v":0},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G78,\"X\")","v":0},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G78,\"N/A\")","v":1}]
[]
[null,null,"PRINCIPLES RELATED TO GENERIC USER NEEDS AND EXPECTATIONS",null,{"$f":"IF(G39>0,(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G66:G78,\"✓\"))/((COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G66:G78,\"X\"))+(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G66:G78,\"✓\"))),0)","v":0.5},null,{"$f":"(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G66:G78,\"✓\")+COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G66:G78,\"X\"))/4","v":0.5},null,{"$f":"SUM(I31:I37)","v":1},null,{"$f":"SUM(K31:K37)","v":1},null,{"$f":"SUM(M31:M37)","v":2},null,null,1]
[]
[]
[null,null,"ADMINISTRATIVE SIMPLIFICATION",null,{"$f":"IF(G42>0,(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G84,\"✓\"))/((COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G84,\"X\"))+(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G84,\"✓\"))),0)","v":1},null,{"$f":"(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G84,\"✓\")+COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G84,\"X\"))/1","v":1},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G84,\"✓\")","v":1},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G84,\"X\")","v":0},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G84,\"N/A\")","v":0}]
[]
[null,null,"PRESERVATION OF INFORMATION",null,{"$f":"IF(G44>0,(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G88,\"✓\"))/((COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G88,\"X\"))+(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G88,\"✓\"))),0)","v":0},null,{"$f":"(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G88,\"✓\")+COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G88,\"X\"))/1","v":0},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G88,\"✓\")","v":0},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G88,\"X\")","v":0},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G88,\"N/A\")","v":1}]
[]
[null,null,"ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTIVENESS AND EFFICIENCY",null,{"$f":"IF(G46>0,(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G92,\"✓\"))/((COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G92,\"X\"))+(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G92,\"✓\"))),0)","v":1},null,{"$f":"(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G92,\"✓\")+COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G92,\"X\"))/1","v":1},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G92,\"✓\")","v":1},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G92,\"X\")","v":0},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G92,\"N/A\")","v":0}]
[]
[null,null,"FOUNDATION PRINCIPLES FOR COOPERATION AMONG PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIONS",null,{"$f":"IF(G48>0,(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G84:G92,\"✓\"))/((COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G84:G92,\"X\"))+(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G84:G92,\"✓\"))),0)","v":1},null,{"$f":"(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G84:G92,\"✓\")+COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G84:G92,\"X\"))/3","v":0.66666666666666663},null,{"$f":"SUM(I42:I46)","v":2},null,{"$f":"SUM(K42:K46)","v":0},null,{"$f":"SUM(M42:M46)","v":1},null,null,1]
[]
[]
[null,null,"INTEROPERABILITY GOVERNANCE",null,{"$f":"IF(G51>0,(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G98:G108,\"✓\"))/((COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G98:G108,\"X\"))+(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G98:G108,\"✓\"))),0)","v":0.83333333333333337},null,{"$f":"(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G98:G108,\"✓\")+COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G98:G108,\"X\"))/6","v":1},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G98:G108,\"✓\")","v":5},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G98:G108,\"X\")","v":1},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G98:G108,\"N/A\")","v":0}]
[]
[null,null,"INTEGRATED PUBLIC SERVICE GOVERNANCE",null,{"$f":"IF(G53>0,(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G112,\"✓\"))/((COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G112,\"X\"))+(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G112,\"✓\"))),0)","v":1},null,{"$f":"(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G112,\"✓\")+COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G112,\"X\"))/1","v":1},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G112,\"✓\")","v":1},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G112,\"X\")","v":0},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G112,\"N/A\")","v":0}]
[]
[null,null,"LEGAL INTEROPERABILITY",null,{"$f":"IF(G55>0,(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G116,\"✓\"))/((COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G116,\"X\"))+(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G116,\"✓\"))),0)","v":1},null,{"$f":"(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G116,\"✓\")+COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G116,\"X\"))/1","v":1},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G116,\"✓\")","v":1},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G116,\"X\")","v":0},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G116,\"N/A\")","v":0}]
[]
[null,null,"ORGANISATIONAL INTEROPERABILITY",null,{"$f":"IF(G57>0,(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G123:G125,\"✓\"))/((COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G123:G125,\"X\"))+(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G123:G125,\"✓\"))),0)","v":0},null,{"$f":"(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G123:G125,\"✓\")+COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G123:G125,\"X\"))/2","v":0},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G123:G125,\"✓\")","v":0},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G123:G125,\"X\")","v":0},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G123:G125,\"N/A\")","v":2},null,null,1]
[]
[null,null,"SEMANTIC INTEROPERABILITY",null,{"$f":"IF(G59>0,(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G129:G133,\"✓\"))/((COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G129:G133,\"X\"))+(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G129:G133,\"✓\"))),0)","v":1},null,{"$f":"(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G129:G133,\"✓\")+COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G129:G133,\"X\"))/3","v":0.66666666666666663},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G129:G133,\"✓\")","v":2},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G129:G133,\"X\")","v":0},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G129:G133,\"N/A\")","v":1}]
[]
[null,null,"TECHNICAL INTEROPERABILITY*",null,{"$f":"IF(G61>0,(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G24:G40,\"✓\"))/((COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G24:G40,\"X\"))+(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G24:G40,\"✓\"))),0)","v":0.77777777777777779},null,{"$f":"(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G24:G40,\"✓\")+COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G24:G40,\"X\"))/9","v":1}]
[]
[null,null,"INTEROPERABILITY LAYERS",null,{"$f":"IF(G63>0,((COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G98:G133,\"✓\"))+(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G24:G40,\"✓\")))/(((COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G98:G133,\"X\"))+(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G98:G133,\"✓\")))+((COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G24:G40,\"X\"))+(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G24:G40,\"✓\")))),0)","v":0.84210526315789469},null,{"$f":"(((COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G98:G133,\"X\"))+(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G98:G133,\"✓\")))+((COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G24:G40,\"X\"))+(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G24:G40,\"✓\"))))/22","v":0.86363636363636365},null,{"$f":"SUM(I51:I59,I20)","v":16},null,{"$f":"SUM(K51:K59,K20)","v":3},null,{"$f":"SUM(M51:M59,M20)","v":3},null,null,1]
[]
[null,null,"*The technical interoperability layer is covered by the criteria corresponding to the core interoperability principle ''Openness''. "]
[]
[null,null,"OVERALL SCORE",null,{"$f":"IF(G67>0,(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G18:G133,\"✓\"))/((COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G18:G133,\"X\"))+(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G18:G133,\"✓\"))),0)","v":0.80645161290322576},null,{"$f":"(COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G18:G133,\"✓\")+COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G18:G133,\"X\"))/37","v":0.83783783783783783},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G18:G133,\"✓\")","v":25},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G18:G133,\"X\")","v":6},null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Assessment_EIF!G18:G133,\"N/A\")","v":6},null,null,1]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,"The automated score is the percentage of “favorable” answers out of all the answers. \nThe CAMSS assessment strength is the percentage of \"favorable\" and \"unfavorable\" answers out of all the answers. "]

{"sheet":"ResultsODSAT","index":14,"n_rows":0,"n_cols":0,"rows_kept":0,"cut":false,"hidden":true,"merged":[]}